If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 11:40 on August 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) was placed in front of the unification bridge in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-si, the Sin-si, on the ground that there was no access certificate from soldiers; (b) demanded the victim B, who was the driver of the taxi on his/her own, to continue to enter the taxi with the printing store; and (c) did not get off from the taxi while demanding the victim B, who was the driver of the taxi on his/her own, to leave the taxi; and (d) if the victim tried to drive a taxi in order to return to the taxi, the Defendant opened a door and prevented the operation of the taxi by force for about 2 hours and 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.