beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.08 2015가단209831

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 1,565,100 to Plaintiff B; KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff A; and each of them, from February 3, 2014 to September 8, 2016.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In full view of the facts without dispute between the parties concerned, as well as the overall purport of Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-1, and 2-2, the plaintiff Eul is a DNA woman, the plaintiff Eul's spouse, and the defendant is the Cho Jong-si's early death, and the defendant was a trial expenses in relation to the return of the real estate sales contract that the plaintiff was left to the defendant at the F. F. F. K. K. K. K. K.'s office in P. P. P. P. P. on February 3, 2014, the plaintiff was injured by the plaintiff's own h.m. with the right hand, and the plaintiff's h.m.'s h., the plaintiff's h.m.'s h.'s h. and the h.m.'s h.'s h., which caused the plaintiff's injury to the plaintiff's h.m.'s h., and the plaintiff's h.m.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 5, Gap evidence 2-1 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the injury inflicted on the plaintiff A.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of subparagraph 3, Plaintiff B claims that Plaintiff B paid KRW 498,500, the Plaintiff’s hospitalized treatment cost of Plaintiff A from February 7, 2014 to February 11, 2014, and KRW 565,100 ( KRW 498,500 + KRW 66,600 + KRW 66,600) in total, for Plaintiff A’s outpatient treatment cost of Plaintiff A from April 30, 2014, other than Plaintiff B, due to the foregoing injury, as described in the attached Table, the Plaintiff claimed that Plaintiff incurred KRW 24,75,67,648,68.