Although the defendant agreed with the victim and is a recipient of basic living security and is not healthy, the court below is also considered to have imposed a fine on the defendant, taking into account the circumstances that existed prior to the pronouncement of the judgment of the court below, and there are no special circumstances or circumstantial factors that may be newly considered in sentencing after the judgment of the court below was rendered, and the defendant has concealed the scene while clearly aware that the occurrence of the traffic accident occurred, and the defendant has resulted in the traffic accident until he is requested to the police, and the act of escape after the accident is hidden, is highly likely to cause another accident in the course of escape and tracking, and the crime of making it difficult to recover the damage by making it difficult to identify the person who has caused the traffic accident. The defendant operated a vehicle which has not been covered by mandatory insurance for more than two years, taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the method of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and the defendant's age and character, etc., the defendant's assertion is not justified.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.