On November 2005, the Defendant issued a request from the Defendant F to the Defendant F, who is a branch of the Defendant’s personal office located in Ansan-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, to the effect that “In the course of operating a restaurant from the Mapo-si, Mapo-si, the above restaurant will be admitted into the site of the 2nd area of the Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-be, Ma.”

In September 2006, the Defendant, at the above office, stated that “The amount of KRW 3 billion should be paid to the victim from the site of the restaurant operated by the Party in the manner of raising an objection to the Central Land Expropriation Committee again, as well as from the compensation for expropriation to H, G, I, and J, the neighboring land. However, in order to do such work, it is necessary to have the amount of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

However, in fact, the defendant was only able to prepare a written opinion on the judgment for the victim, and there was no intention or ability to have the victim receive the compensation of more than two times the expected compensation, and even if the victim does not receive the compensation of more than three billion won, he/she also wishes to pay the money received from the victim.