However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 11, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Sung-nam branch of Suwon District Court.

On June 18, 2020, at around 02:20, the Defendant driven the E-land under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.180% from the 500-meter section around the Daejeon Central District, Daejeon, to the same Gu D, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 500 meters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Report prior to judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, and application of summary order statutes of the same criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although there is a career of drinking driving twice the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, this is ten years or more, it is against the fact that it is drinking, drinking, drinking, and other conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act that are shown in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: