When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant provided cargo transport brokerage services under the trade name of “D.”

1. Around June 13, 2013, the Defendant stated that “If the Defendant deposits KRW 2,1230,000,000 to KRW 19,30,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 19,30,000,000,000,000 won are deposited to the victim at the office of the company run by the victim F in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the Defendant would return the following money to the victim.”

However, even if receiving the above money, there was no intention to confirm it at the tax office and return it.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim and received 2,1230,000 won from the victim to the new bank passbook in the name of the Defendant around that time.

2. Around September 16, 2013, the Defendant stated that “Around September 16, 2013, the Defendant would return the above passbook to the victim, prior to the victim’s office, such as the one borrowed money and the one deposited in the passbook prior to the search and seizure of the passbook, necessary to recover the above passbook because it was short of KRW 2 million.”

However, there was no idea that the head of the Tong would return money as well as the fact that there was no seizure.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2 million won from the victim’s occupation.

3. On September 26, 2013, around September 26, 2013, the Defendant stated, “Around September 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the victim’s office, the victim stated that “it was almost almost all at the time of finding a passbook confiscated in the court; but (b) 90,000 won was insufficient.

However, the court did not have any intention or ability to repay the money borrowed as well as there was no seizure of the passbook.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 900,000 from the victim’s position.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant;