However, each of the two years from the date of the final judgment against the Defendants.

Defendant

A is the executive director of E in Young-gu, Suwon-si, a person in charge of overall business affairs of the above company, and Defendant B is the representative director of G (owner) in the Kimhae-si, a person in charge of overall business affairs of the above company, and Defendant C is the managing director of G (owner) in the Boyang-si, Anyang-si, a person in charge of overall business affairs of the above company, and J, K, L, and M are the joint operators of (owner)O located in the nineth floor of the NO in the Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan, a person in charge of overall business affairs of the above company.

1. In order to promote the employment of the aged who are difficult to find employment or change their occupation, Defendant A paid a certain amount of subsidy, i.e., subsidies for extension of employment of the aged, in proportion to the number of the aged who continue to work according to the retirement age abolished or extended by an employer who extends or discontinues the retirement age

In addition to the above J, the Defendant: (a) abused the fact that a public official in charge of the payment of subsidies for extension of employment of the aged submits the documents, such as the rules of employment, to verify the repeal and extension of the retirement age based solely on the documents submitted as evidence of the requirements for payment; (b) received the above subsidies by extending the retirement age or by falsely preparing and submitting the rules of employment as if he abolished the retirement age; and (c) promised to pay approximately 20-30

Accordingly, the above J made a false collective agreement on July 1, 2007, which stipulates the retirement age as of July 1, 2010 when the retirement age was extended from 57 years to 65 years of age on July 1, 2010 by E (State) office at the date of September 2013, while the fact that E (State) had not been extended from 57 years of age to 65 years of age on July 1, 2010, while the retirement age was reached from 65 years of age, thereby making the collective agreement on July 1, 2007, which stipulates the retirement age as of July 1, 200 when the retirement age was extended from 57 years to 65 years of age. The Defendant affixed the rubber and seal of the representative of workers and the representative of employers under the said collective agreement