On January 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement, etc. at the District Court on February 7, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 7, 2015. On January 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in the support for the care of the Suwon Friwon, and the judgment was finalized on January 23, 2016.

"2014 Highest 9343"

1. On November 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) the Victim C, who became aware of the fact that he/she became a member of the Namsan church located in Yongsan-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, 1277, Goyang-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 1277, should pay money for business purposes.

A false statement was made with a loan of KRW 10 million, stating that he/she shall be repaid within one to two weeks.

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the money was borrowed.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim who is affiliated with it, and received KRW 5 million on November 28, 2013, and acquired KRW 10 million in total by remittance.

2. On December 4, 2013, the Defendant continued to make a false statement to the Defendant’s E (ju) office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building’s fifth floor, stating that “If the Defendant had negotiated with a famous company called a foreign affiliated F, he/she would promptly repay the credit card, etc. because he/she had lent the card and cash, etc., he/she would have received credit cards, etc. from the injured party, and thereafter, the Defendant continued to make a false statement to the victim requesting the repayment of the borrowed money to the effect that “if he/she goes to work in the company as a guarantee, he/she would have to take stocks as security.”

However, in fact, the wages of the employees of the company at the time were not paid properly, and the company was not operated normally due to the absence of any particular operating funds or assets, and the progress of the business with F is not clear, and there was no intention or ability to pay them even if they were used with the card issued by the injured party or borrowed money.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving him/her, shall be from the damaged person.