If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BMW car.

At around 14:50 on October 13, 2012, the Defendant, at the time of Jinju-si, proceeded along the two lanes in the Sinju-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-S

Since the maximum speed of restriction is designated as 100 km/h, there was a duty of care to observe the speed limit and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the back portion of the vehicle left side of the vehicle, which was changed from two lanes to one lane, from the right side of the vehicle in front, by negligence of speed of about 193 km in speed at the speed of 193km.

After all, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, suffered from an acute fluoral fluoral fluor to the victim E (the age of 18) of the victim of the vehicle in question, and at the same time damaged the bus owned by the victim F (the State) to cover KRW 3,540,90 for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Notification of the results of a request for speed analysis (comprehensive analysis);

1. Commissioning for appraisal;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;