beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고합250

변호사법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

900,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On June 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2016.

[2] The Defendant is a person who runs a construction business company D in Busan East-gu from the end of March 2011 to March 2016.

In addition, E is between the Defendant and the person who is engaged in security business as a member of the F organization and the Defendant from around 2009-2010, and G is a person who has been engaged in the securities broadcasting industry of H between March 2009 and March 2013, and is a part of the society of the above E.

On May 29, 2015, this Part I was charged with the violation of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act in relation to the market price of J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) in Seoul Southern District Court from March 201 to April 201, as a person who was detained on the charge of violating the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act in relation to the market price from March 29, 201 to April 201, and was involved in the market price of stocks of G and J and K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “K”).

From the end of 2012 - around the end of 2013, the Defendant is able to find out whether “A Dong Dong Dong G, who is an infant, will be a matter at a financial supervisory agency, etc. in the future with regard to the management of the market price of K's stocks with I connected with him/her, and whether it can be identified on the side of the reduction of the gold level.

“After receiving request,” “E is not only I but also other participants and will be at the market price to operate the market.”

All relevant persons shall be subject to the investigation of financial supervisory agencies, and may be detained later.

The purport of “E” is that E sent Defendant’s talk to G, E, and the Defendant talked with each other by having the Defendant handle the work so that I and participants do not receive any investigation in response to the solicitation of the person concerned with the financial supervisory authority, if G receives money from G under the pretext of the financial supervisory authority’s investigation into the K share price manipulation case.

Accordingly, G around March 4, 2013, at the non-commercial coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, I am to the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office.