Part concerning Defendant B and C shall be reversed.

Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant C.

A. Defendants 1) Defendant A’s assertion of mistake of the facts in the instant case was made by Defendant A using a physical card delivered by Defendant A to the withdrawal of the organization of the fraud crime, i.e., the part deposited into the account in the name of BU out of the attached crime list (1), 3, 12, 7, 10, 11, 10, 13, 2, 2, 13, 13, 2, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 10, 10,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000).

However, with respect to the crime of fraud (1) No. 8 per annum of the above annex punishment, the court below decided to dismiss the public prosecution in accordance with the cancellation of the public prosecutor's indictment. Thus, this part of the argument is not subject to the judgment of this court.

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of all the charges of fraud, although the defendant did not participate in the crime and the crime of fraud against the defendant was not established.

2) Each sentence that the court below sentenced the defendants to the defendants (one year of imprisonment, two years of imprisonment, and three years of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable.

(c)

Each of the above types of punishment that the prosecutor's court below committed against Defendant A and C is too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination

A. As to Defendant A’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the public offering does not require any legal penalty in relation to accomplices who are jointly processed by more than two persons in a crime, but is only a combination of intent to realize a crime by combining two or more persons to jointly process a crime.

Although there was no parent process in the whole, there was no parent process.

Even a number of persons.