수임료
1. The Defendant shall pay 53 million won to the Plaintiff and 20% per annum from January 8, 2015 to the day of complete payment.
According to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, around July 3, 2014, the plaintiff concluded a delegation contract between the defendant and the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office 2013 and No. 1922 on the defense of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc. of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (including value-added tax), 7 million won (the time the plaintiff is subject to a disposition of non-prosecution without payment), 10 million won (the time the plaintiff is subject to a disposition of non-prosecution), and 30 million won (the time the plaintiff is subject to a disposition of non-prosecution after repayment of the advance payment of the construction work and the time when he is suspected of being subject to a disposition of non-prosecution), and on the ground that the plaintiff submitted a written opinion to the defendant on August 25, 2014, the defendant cannot be found to have paid the unpaid amount of 70 million won to the defendant public prosecutor's office 4.
In regard to this, the defendant requested the plaintiff to commence the legal counsel's business if the remaining retainers are paid at the time of paying 4.4 million won, which is part of the retainers, but the plaintiff voluntarily submitted the legal counsel appointment system, and as long as the defendant did not pay the remaining retainers, the delegation agreement on the appointment of the legal counsel becomes null and void and thus the plaintiff cannot claim the payment of the fees. However, the delegation agreement between the plaintiff