However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 5, 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim E on 101 1305 dong 1305, F apartment owned by the Defendant at the office of licensed real estate agents in Chungcheongnam-si on 2014. The Defendant purchased the above apartment house and 101 505 dong 1305 dong 20,000,000 won as security, and 300,000,000 won as above 1305 and 505 2,00,000 won for each of the above 1.7 billion won and 2,000,000 won as interest on the above loan from December 1, 2013, the Defendant was unable to pay 3.2 billion won as interest on the above loan to the victim, and the Defendant was unable to receive a demand for the payment of interest on the lease deposit money from the Defendant on 200,000 won in Seoul, and thus, the Defendant did not have any duty to return it to the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the G and E);

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against G and accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A loan transaction agreement, data on application for individual rehabilitation, and data on search of auction cases;

1. An investigation report (attaching text messages to pay interest and urge text messages);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment;