When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is a person who operates the BMW vehicle owned by the modern Capital.

1. The Defendant, from the Hadman on December 2, 2016 to February 9, 2017, operated the BMF vehicle, which was ordered to suspend the operation of which was issued at a daily center in the Sung-nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, on 10 occasions, in violation of the order to stop the operation.

2. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) carried out the instant BMW vehicle with a license plate attached to the instant BMW vehicle owned by the Defendant, the number plate of which was kept as an order to suspend operation, at the office located in the branch of Gyeonggi-gu, Chungcheongnam-si; and (b) exercised the said BM vehicle with a license plate attached to the E number plate attached to the vehicle owned by the Defendant from February 9, 2017 at that time until February 9, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Articles 82 subparagraph 2-2 and 24-2 (2) of the relevant Act on the Management of Motor Vehicles for the crime, Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the violation of an order to suspend operation), Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the violation of an order to suspend operation), and Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the violation of an order to stop operation);

1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2 and 3, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the violation of the law and the absence of criminal records exceeding the fine for the past 15 years);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;