약정금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from May 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016.
Around 2011, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,000 to the Defendant. Around October 5, 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 30,000,000 among the Defendant as one copy of monthly and paid KRW 30,000 to the Defendant until August 30, 2013. The Defendant paid KRW 5,00,000 among the above loans on October 6, 2013, and the Defendant paid interest (or damages for delay, which is less than the amount of interest originally agreed upon with the Plaintiff after consultation with the Plaintiff) until April 2016, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000 to the Plaintiff by the date following the date of the Plaintiff’s written evidence Nos. 1, 1, and 30,000,000 and delay damages by the purport of the entire pleadings is not subject to the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the Plaintiff’s annual interest rate of KRW 30,500,000, May 16.
The defendant asserts that the plaintiff should be exempted from 20,000,000 won out of the debt amounting to 25,000,000 won and should be paid only 5,00,000 won. However, since there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.