횡령
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On October 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for night-time intrusion larceny at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2013.
On June 2010, the Defendant agreed to purchase the value of the machinery from the revenue generated by the operation of the game room by the Defendant after purchasing the recreation machine between the victim and the victim, which was operated by the victim of the first floor of the 1st floor of the Busan Dongdong-gu B building in Busan.
around that time, the Defendant received at least 37 times a game room with a market value of 15 million won (game name museum, CC-NA-09123-09) from the game site of "F" located in Jung-gu, Busan (F) and operated the game room. After that, the Defendant transferred the above game machine from "H Gameland" located near Daejeon-gu G, and operated the game room from August 1, 2010 to the same year.
8. From August 18, 2010 to July 17, 201, a game room was operated using the above game machine in the “I Game Site” near the above G. The same year from around August 18, 2010
9. From March 13, 200 to Seo-gu Daejeon, the “K Gameland” kept 37 amusement machines for the victim by operating the game room using the above amusement machines.
On September 13, 2010, the Defendant arbitrarily transferred the said amusement machine to “M game room” located in the preceding week prior to North Korea, without the consent of the victim, and operated the business until September 19, 2010 of the same year. Around that time, the Defendant provided the entire said amusement machine as security for N at his own expense at the influent area below the Daejeon Dong-dong, Daejeon.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. Previous records: Application of each copy of the judgment;
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;
1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;
1. Articles 70 and 69 of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.