beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011.05.19 2010나54094 (2)

구상금 등

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or the following facts can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1-1-5, Gap evidence 2-1 through 7, Gap evidence 3-1-4, Gap evidence 4-1-2, Gap evidence 5-1 through 4, Gap evidence 6-1-3, Gap evidence 7-1-2, Gap evidence 7-8, Gap evidence 9-1, 2, Gap evidence 10, 22, 28, Gap evidence 32-1 through 3, Gap evidence 36, 37, Gap evidence 117, Gap evidence 120-3, Gap evidence 14-3, Gap evidence 213, Gap evidence 215-1, 215-2, Gap evidence 3-1-3, and 3-1 or 3-1 of the whole court's arguments, and the purport of the fact inquiry as to Gap evidence 9-2, Gap evidence 3 of the whole court's arguments.

The deceasedO (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on April 9, 1982 as the founder of the P Group. The deceased’s property heir of this wife Q (the deceased died on July 12, 1954) is the defendant J, Women’s R, 2 South and North Defendant K, 3 South and North Defendant L, 2 and 5 South, 5 South and North Korea T, 6 Plaintiffs A, and their children born on February 9, 1956, and 7 South and North C, 4 women U, 5 children U, and 5 children of the deceased and their children were registered as the deceased’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s heir’s heir’s heir’s heir’s heir’s heir’s 981 and 196 children’s husband’s husband’s husband’s heir’s 1 and 2.6 children’s husband’s husband’s heir’s 196 children’s shares.

B. From the 1940s to 1940s, the Deceased operates 20 affiliated companies, and came back from the management day before and after around 1970, and 3 companies, which form the principal power of the P Group, X Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “X”), Y Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Y”), Y Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Y”), and Y Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Y”), respectively.