However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 3, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, at the port branch of Daegu District Court on September 3, 2007, and on September 5, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court.

At around 15:40 on January 2, 2019, the Defendant driven an Eone Star vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.140% from the 1km section from the roads near the north-gu B market in Sposi to the roads in front of the same Gu C apartment Ddong.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, the report on the circumstances of drinking drivers, and the next inquiry;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records and summary order statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the punishment for a crime [the selection of imprisonment and the blood alcohol concentration level, etc. shall be taken into account];

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the violation of an error and the fact that a traffic accident has not been caused from the driving of this case);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution [Considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation and the fact that there is no criminal record subject to suspended execution or more severe punishment since 200];

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;