However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant’s insult, on July 8, 2017, did not pay food value at a restaurant with the trade name “E” of the operation of the D in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, as of March 8, 2017, and did not pay food value to the site upon the above D’s report, thereby calculating the food value from the victim G, who is the police official belonging to the police station of the Goyang-gu police station F District of the above D.

“Along with the hearing of the horses, the victim D, H, the police officer of the victim’s Dong fee, and the Defendant 2’s working, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly fluoring the victim by “C. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.,” and “C. f. d. f. f. f. f.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties does not take a bath from the above G at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

“Along with the word “,” the body of the said G was tightly pushed off one time by the body of the said G, which caused the said G to go beyond the floor by facing the entrance of the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of public duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of G police statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Sick photographs of the assault of a victimized police officer;

1. Report on investigation (on-site inspection) and application of statutes to photographs of the scene of the case;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account the fact that there is a need to strictly punish police officers who perform official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation, and that there was a lot of past criminal records but there was no criminal records exceeding fines; that there was no significant result; that recently, one million won was deposited for victims;