Defendant

In addition, the argument that the disclosure order and notification order of personal information for five years against the person subject to the request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") are improper does not constitute legitimate grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence, the court below is just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance that ordered the defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for five years, on the basis of the fact-finding of the defendant's conviction as to the defendant's charges, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.