If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 19:00 on January 9, 2020, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the victim C (Nam, 66 years of age) and D in the factory located in the Chungcheongnamcheon-gun B, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant by inserting the phrase “the Defendant’s business operation ability; she shall not be outside the dam; she shall not be outside the dam),” breaking the word “the Defendant’s business operation ability.” The Defendant threatened the Defendant, as a dangerous object on the floor (120cm in total length, approximately 120cm) with the minosdog (120cm in total length) which was a dangerous object on the floor, the shape and the floor of the steel product the victim was seated more than five to six times; and (b) threatened

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act and Articles 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a dangerous thing that threatens the victim by getting the victim from the laul so that the defendant may sit, and thus, the nature of the crime is bad.

The defendant was unable to receive an application from the victim, and the victim is punished by the defendant.

However, the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case.

Although the defendant has been punished several times, he/she has no record of being punished for violent crimes.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment is determined as per the disposition.