A. At around 21:40 on November 6, 2014, the Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and went from the northwest-gu, north-gu, at the port of port to the starboard distance, while driving along the two-lane distance from the port side of the two-lane apartment, the Defendant was waiting for the signal at the right angle.

One lane is the left turn line, and in passing through the intersection of the Korean letter of credit, it is necessary to enter the two lanes along the two lanes along the leading line, and the two lanes after the driving distance in the three lanes.

Nevertheless, in violation of this, the Defendant entered the two-lanes between the two-lanes of a shooting distance dry, and entered the two-lanes depending on the straight signal, and received the side of the Plaintiff’s DYF YF Engine and other vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) that entered the two-lanes of a shooting distance string.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was destroyed by KRW 952,686 of the repair cost.

In addition, from November 19, 2014 to December 4, 2014, 18:00 to December 4, 2014, the Plaintiff leased and used HG300 vehicles from PG30 for 15 days by borrowing and lending from PG30 vehicles from Penek Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Senek”). Accordingly, the rent claimed by the Plaintiff from Penek is KRW 4,485,00 (=29,000 daily fee x 15 days).

【Reasons for Recognition】 The descriptions of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts above, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages of this case due to the occupational negligence in violation of the duty to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the leading line so that he does not deviate from his lane by examining the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages of this case.

3. Scope of loss;

(a) Expenses for automobile repair: 952,600 won (the amount claimed by the plaintiff within the scope of the expenses for automobile repair in the front);

B. The Plaintiff is against the Defendant.