When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 12, 2017, the Defendant entered D hotel studio studio in D hotel in C when lighting around 01:10 and ordered the victim E to pay the alcohol value as if he/she had the ability to pay the alcohol value.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have cash or credit card or any other means of payment, and even if he receives alcohol, salutism, etc. from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the normal drinking value.

The defendant deceivings the victim by the above method, and was provided by the injured party with an aggregate of 400,000 won, including the market price, at the same time during the 12-year Myski 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.