The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the BM5 vehicle volume.

On September 13:35, 2017, the Defendant came to turn to the left from the Myeon of the Eup office of the captain to the Do Council member building.

Since there is a crosswalk where no signal, etc. is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle so that pedestrians can safely walk and prevent accidents in advance, if there is pedestrians on the crosswalk by checking whether there is pedestrians on the crosswalk and accurately manipulating the steering gear, brake and other devices of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and continued to find a pedestrian without discovering the pedestrian, and caused the victim E (73 taxes, women) who walked on the crosswalk from the right side of the vehicle to the left side of the vehicle to go beyond the floor by shocking the victim E (73 taxs, women) to the upper part of the front part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the soften-day therapy, by negligence on the part of the Defendant, to the victim, such as the soften-day therapy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of traffic accident occurrence status prepared by E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation results, a report on actual condition of a traffic accident, a report on internal investigation (referring to the circumstances surrounding receipt of an accident), a report on investigation (referring to the situation at the time of the accident and attaching photographs to the site), and a report on investigation (referring

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 3(1)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, on the grounds of sentencing, is an unfavorable circumstance, where the crime of this case was committed in favor of the pedestrian who dried up the crosswalk, and the crime of this case is bad, and the degree of injury of the victim is not weak, and that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim.

However, the defendant.