A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant agreed with the victim when the judgment was made in the trial, that the Defendant’s mistake was against the victim through a prison life for more than two months, that the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for drunk driving, and that other reasons for sentencing as stated in the arguments and records of this case, including the Defendant’s age, family relationship, health status, criminal records, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following decision is rendered after pleading.

[Discied reasoning of the judgment below] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by the court is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted as it is in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018); Article 154 subparagraph 2 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Crimes under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (trades under Articles 40 and 50 of the Road Traffic Act and those under the Road Traffic Act);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;