beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.01.23 2013고정718

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million on December 28, 2009 and a fine of KRW 700,000 on September 6, 201, respectively, by this court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Nevertheless, at around 14:30 on September 7, 2013, the Defendant driven a motor bicycle B 10ck under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.202% in the section of about 2km from the Jin-do, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si to the front day of the brea-dong, Min-si, Sinsan-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has committed the crime of this case, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case on the following occasions: although it is recognized that the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the support of the elderly in an economically difficult situation, the defendant's health is not good, it is recognized that the traffic accident occurred due to the driving of alcohol, the blood alcohol concentration exceeds 0.2%, and the distance of driving under the influence of alcohol is not shorter than the short. Considering all circumstances such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case on three occasions, including the criminal record of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the judgment, despite the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case on the other hand, it is difficult to view that the fine for

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.