2. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years;

3.Provided, That it shall be for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below acquitted the defendant of the above facts charged, although it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed a fire as stated in this part of the facts charged. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On February 7, 2014, the Defendant: around 02:14 on February 7, 2014, the summary of this part of the facts charged: around 202: (1) around 20:3, the Defendant: From 20,000 to 20,000 U.S., the lower court determined that the Defendant was not guilty of the facts charged on the ground that: (a) the lower court, based on the evidence duly adopted and the following circumstances acknowledged by the Prosecutor, 20,000 G owned by the victim G, which was parked in the front of the Fmat in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, Ma, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged on the ground that: (b) the lower court’s first 20,000 YM 2:1:20,000 YM 2:3:00,000 YM 2:3:0,000 YM 2:3:3:0,000.