If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at “C convenience store” located in “C convenience store”; (b) at “C convenience store” located in “C” and (c) as if he/she were to lend and return telephone calls; and (d) at “D’s mobile phone, Co., Ltd., Ltd.

During the period from around 200 to May 14, 2017, 100 won was charged to T-moneone (T-money) transportation card for the issuance of Ss, and 1,247,600 won was exempted from paying the payment using the Handphone small payment service without D’s consent, and also, from around that time to May 14, 2017, in the same manner as written in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits by inputting information without authority into a computer or any other information processing device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on settlement of small amounts;

1. Relevant Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; (b) the owner of the mobile phone owned by the actual injured person; and (c) the restoration of damage to E; and (d) the submission of each written agreement; (b) the Defendant’s age, environment; and (c) the circumstances after committing the crime, etc.; and (d)