The defendant (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor, June, and confiscation) of the court below is too unreasonable.

The lower court’s sentence of the prosecutor (e.g., e., e., g., e., e.

The sentencing guidelines [Scope of punishment by law] 15 years or less (determination of types of public document] : Each offense of forging or forging public document: Type 1 (non-business or non-systematic use of the relevant forged document, since a person who forges public document uses the relevant forged document, the crime of uttering of forged public document is not treated as multiple crimes, and is treated as sentencing factors rather than sentencing factors). The offense of forging forged public document is not set on the sentencing guidelines [Scope of recommending punishment]: Each offense of forging public document: From August to 15 (limited to concurrent crimes with no sentencing guidelines) [limited to multiple sentencing guidelines] from August to 15] from 8, 15 [limited to concurrent crimes with no sentencing guidelines], and from 20 years from 20 months from 3 months from 15 months from 20, from 2000 to 3 months from 20, from the judgment of the court below without any change in the sentencing guidelines (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2007Da15254888, Jan. 25, 2015).

Therefore, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.