The court below rejected the grounds for appeal concerning mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles on the determination that the facts charged in this case are recognized as stated in its reasoning.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the publication of false facts and negligence.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.