2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant suffered an injury as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below and the victim abused the victim shall be sufficiently recognized.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

(1) The injured party requested assistance from the defendant to the Gangseodo Gan-dong Art. 1-A of the judgment of the court below on the day after he was assaulted by the defendant on the day of paragraph 1-A of the judgment of the court below, and consulted with the defendant about the facts of the harm that was assaulted by the defendant, and then received medical treatment at the emergency department of the Dongindoin Hospital, and 1-

(b).

On the date of paragraphs (1) and (2), the victim was provided with medical treatment at a hospital on or after or after the victim was abused by the Defendant (see, e.g., diagnosis of each injury). (2) The victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court below to the court below to the effect that he/she suffered bodily injury by being abused several times by the Defendant, and the victim’s statement on the method and process of the assault is consistent with the specific and major parts, and thus, is credibility, as there is no contradiction between them.

③ After the Defendant received the original copy of the payment order and received the original copy of the payment order, the circumstance that the Defendant received the written diagnosis of each injury under paragraph (1) of the judgment of the lower court on the same day when the Defendant received the original copy of the payment order.

However, in light of the contents of the police investigation and the statement of the witness in the court below, the victim did not report the assault while living together with the defendant and tried to live well with the defendant. However, the victim received an application for payment order from the defendant before.