2. Although it is recognized that the Defendant, who made a judgment, led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, it seems that it had already been considered in the sentencing of the lower court.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed by a non-discriminatory assaulting the victim who was 100,000 won on the ground that the defendant did not repay it to 100,000 won. In light of the method and content of the crime, etc., the crime was considerably poor in light of the method and content of the crime, and there was a record of criminal punishment against the defendant several times as violent crimes. In particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case on the one-year and one-month basis after release without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime, the equity of sentencing with the sentencing with the same and similar incidents, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence, etc.,

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.