A. The land of this case is owned by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant respectively as follows, and the land owned by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant individually is as follows:

Plaintiff A 265/4710 O Plaintiff 2 B B 198/4710 P 3 C 261/4710 Q 4 D 261/4710 Q 5 E 10/4710, Plaintiff 6, 7 G 240/4710 T 7 G 240/4710 T 8 H 672/4710 U 9 I 396/4710 P 10 J 10 J 265/4710 P 111 K 198/4710 P 530/4710, Defendant 794/4710 W.

B. From April 23, 2004 to develop the instant land as a site for electric source housing from around 29,744 square meters of P tree 29,74 square meters in racing, it was divided into the instant land and P,O, T, X, X, Y, Q, Q, R, U, W, and Y X from July 1, 2004;

After the division on March 28, 201 from ZY-si X-si, the registration conversion was made with 861 square meters prior to AA-si on the same day on the same day.

The land was divided into land, and the remaining land except the land in this case was divided into the prospective site for the electric source housing, and the land in this case was divided into the roads to enter the above site for the electric source housing.

C. The plaintiffs and the defendant are above A.

As in the same paragraph, the land of this case is owned by the defendant, and is connected to the meritorious service by linking with the land of Y on the race city owned by the defendant.

On the other hand, there was no partition agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant on the land of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] 1 to 4 (including each number), the appraisal by the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above acknowledged facts, the Plaintiffs, co-owners of the land of this case, may file a claim for partition against the Defendant pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.

B. Division of one method of partition of co-owned property may be chosen at will if the co-owners reach an agreement, but no agreement is reached.