However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 21, 2016, from around 02:37 to 02:47 the same day, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victim E (the aged 36) was unable to enter the sobrying room in a sobrying condition while the victim E (the aged 36) was under the influence of alcohol; (b) on the ground that the Defendant’s access to the Defendant was prevented, and (c) on the ground that the Defendant measured the drinking alcohol of she and she measured the drinking alcohol.

D. V. L.N. L. L.C.

“Abrying that it was intended to read, set off on the floor of the upper, and cut down a drinking string, etc., the locked of other customers who were locked in a sobrying room.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bath business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV image closure;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is [the scope of recommended punishment] and the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act reflects the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) (no person subject to special sentencing] [a person subject to special sentencing] [a person subject to sentencing], taking into account the criminal history and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after committing the crime, etc.