2. It should be recognized that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and divided each of the crimes of this case, and that there are children who should support.

However, the amount of fraud caused by each fraud of this case is not so big, and the victim seems to have suffered a considerable economic and mental suffering.

There is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment because the damage was not completely recovered to the trial, and no new sentencing data has been submitted in the trial.

In full view of other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, especially the fact that the injured person continuously wants to punish the Defendant, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.