2. In light of the circumstances and methods of the instant crime, etc., the Defendant is not deemed to have committed the instant crime, and the Defendant is deemed to have committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime. On the other hand, it is recognized that there are some other factors to consider the circumstances of the instant crime, and the victims do not want the punishment of the Defendant by mutual consent between the victims and the victims, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, behavior, environment, family relationship, health status, the details, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unjustifiable and unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.