공사대금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
It is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was awarded a subcontract under an agreement to receive construction cost according to the quantity and unit price agreed upon by the Defendant even if he/she neglected the testimony of Gap’s evidence 13, Gap’s evidence 14-1, and Eul’s testimony of the party witness F.
[In light of F’s testimony, evidence Nos. 5, 8, and 13 (each construction volume table) is merely a kind of work converted into one day by the human father and a unit price classification, and it is recognized that the Defendant did not state the wages to be paid to the human father.
On the other hand, the plaintiff is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 94,598,650 won after deducting taxes from the amount of 94,598,650 won since the plaintiff received 200,70,700 won from the defendant as to the 3,8,9,100 stories and the unit price for the 3,00,000 stories and 106,000 won for the 3,00,000,000 won for the 3,00,000,000 won for the 3,00,000,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 3,8,9,000,000,000 won for the 10,000 won for the 3,08,000,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 10.
2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.