If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

A. On March 26, 2014, at around 20:50, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s entertainment tavern business for about 10 minutes by force, by entering the “Dju” operated by the victim C in Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, as a customer, leaving the said Dju to drink 3 disease, leaving the beer 1 disease on the floor of the said Dju without any justifiable reason, cutting off the beer, and cutting off the beer 1 disease on the surface of the said Dju, and cutting off the beer 2 disease on the wall.

B. The Defendant destroyed property damage: (a) the date and time indicated in the foregoing paragraph; and (b) at a place where the table was marked on a glass wall located on the tables; (c) the market price was 4.80,000 won; and (d) the Defendant damaged the glass equivalent to the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of field photographs, written estimates, and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the Defendant’s act of committing the crime of this case, which is a repeated crime as a crime of the same kind, and thus, again commits the crime of this case. However, the extent of damage is relatively minor. The Defendant committed a mistake in this court, and there is an agreement with the victim, and there are favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, career, environment, etc. as shown in the argument of this case.