If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On June 7, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant brought a dispute on the ground that he did not pay KRW 1,200,000 to the victim D (Nam, 31 years of age) who was working as the delivery source for the purpose that he did not pay KRW 1,20,000,000 to the head of the Tong. The Defendant carried out a dispute on the ground that he did not want to pay for the time. At around 23:0, the Defendant carried out a dispute on the ground that he did not want to pay KRW 1,20,000 to the victim’s face, her part, and her part, and walked to the victim’s face, her part, and her part, with approximately 10 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Grade D among the protocol of interrogation of the police against the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of document: Attachment of copy of document: Assault report at the scene of the assault case, police identification report against D, copy of suspect D's personal records, and copy of emergency medical records, respectively);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.