When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:00 on June 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 00:0, the victim D, operated by Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, expressed that the victim D, was able to drink before the E convenience store and she was seated in the test room installed therein, and she was placed on the floor, so as to prevent customers using the convenience store from entering, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store operation by force for about one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of G and H

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all other circumstances such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, etc., including the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is confession and against the defendant, and the victim does not want the punishment.