도로법위반
The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.
1. On August 27, 1993, at around 22:05 on August 27, 1993, the employees A, who are the accused of the facts charged, operate the vehicle of the accused in excess of the vehicle loading weight limit on the street at the mid-top Highway business site located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; the same year
9. 1. Around 00:10, the Defendant’s vehicle was excessively operated at the same place.
2. Determination and conclusion, the effect of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2012Hun-Ga18, Oct. 25, 2012 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged. Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a case not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.