2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although the defendant reflects his mistake, and there is no past history of punishment, it is recognized that the defendant used the game machine that used a speculative game machine to run a tea game room business even though the defendant had already been regulated by the business of using the speculative game machine, the defendant attempted to run the tea game room business by using the altered game machine; the size of the game room of this case is small and its operation is operated and its operation is operated systematically; the crime using the speculative game room business requires strict punishment due to serious harm to the society, such as undermining the awareness of sound labor by promoting excessive speculative spirit to the general public; the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.