However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 6, 2013, at around 21:05, the Defendant driven a 3 km truck without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the 101-dong Hong-gun Hongdong, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun to the front of the 101-dong Hongdong, Hongsung-gun, Hongnam-gun, to the front of the same Eup/Myeon pentok-ri, the Defendant used approximately 3 km

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the hostile inquiry;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the following grounds for sentencing, etc.);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation, community service order, and order to attend a lecture is that the Defendant already committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of being sentenced to a fine and a suspended sentence due to the same violation of the Road Traffic Act on several occasions, and in particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime on two occasions in 2013, even though he/she committed the instant crime on two occasions in the short period of time, and even if he/she committed the instant crime, he/she committed the instant crime in the short period of time, and shows an attitude to light the Road Traffic Act.

On the other hand, however, the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant when making confession of the instant crime, considering the fact that it appears to be against the Defendant’s favorable sentencing factors, and determining the Defendant’s punishment like the disposition, by comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions indicated