도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The circumstances are that the defendant's judgment as to the grounds for appeal of this case divided and reflected the crime of this case, and that the defendant supports the parents who were involved in this case, etc. are favorable or reasonable for the defendant.
However, even though the defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times for committing a crime of the same kind of drinking driving (which means three times only after the sentence is sentenced), the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, the distance operated by the defendant is not shorter than the distance, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time of operation is very high to 0.253%, and the defendant does not seem to have an urgent or inevitable circumstance to drive at the time of the crime of this case, and there are no other circumstances to consider the circumstances of the crime in light of the defendant's age, family environment, occupation, and family relation, even considering the circumstances alleged by the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below's punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too excessive.
2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.