2. The judgment of the defendant committed the instant crime after drinking alcohol, the fact that the court below agreed smoothly with the victim, the aged 68 years old, the disabled in the Vietnam War and became the disabled in the grade 2 of the delayed (verteeb), the health status of the defendant due to the legacy after defoliants, and the fact that the defendant is a general beneficiary under the National Basic Living Security Act is favorable to the defendant.

However, even though the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine of 8 times due to interference with business, the Defendant committed the instant crime, and at the same time, committed the instant crime, the patient’s failure at an emergency room at a hospital at a low time, obstructed the police officer’s service for approximately 2 hours until he is arrested in flagrant offender, or the victim’s hospital treatment service, and taking into account other various matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character, conduct, and environment, as indicated in the instant records and arguments, it does not seem that the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.