If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 17, 2014, the Defendant was demanded to respond to the alcohol alcohol measurement by inserting the trade name in the Sungsan Simsan Simsan-si, Simsan-si, Simsan-si. On the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, drinking, drinking, and drinking, drinking, 30 minutes by inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument three minutes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s demand for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds, stating that “I will not leave the reported person. I did not drive a vehicle while drinking alcohol.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant committed a crime of non-licensed driving under Article 334(1) in that he/she again committed a crime of refusing to measure drinking again even though he/she had been under suspension of execution due to the crime of non-licensed driving. However, the defendant's mistake is against his/her own mistake, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment