When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 21:00 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obtained economic benefits equivalent to the same amount by deceiving the victim D, a business owner, to whom he/she had no intent or ability to pay the drinking value, by deceiving the victim D, and thereby not paying the drinking value, as if he/she did not have an intention or ability to pay the drinking value; (b) thereby, he/she acquired economic benefits equivalent to 380,000 won, such as 40,000 won, and hentent Kentent Kentent Kentent's market price of at least 380,000 won, such as hentent and alcoholic beverages, and not paying the drinking value after eating.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to replys as a result of visiting criminal scene;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;