1. From the beginning of December 2007 to January 22:00, 2008, the Defendant operated a game room in the name of “D amusement room” on the second floor of the building in the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and installed 30 game machine, an illegal speculative machine, and made many and unspecified customers who found the game room enter 10,000 won paper money in the game machine and play the game, and then the customers acquire the right of 5,000 won cultural products from the game machine in accordance with the gains acquired by the game, they carried out a speculative act by exchanging the above merchandise in cash, excluding 10% of commission.

2. From May 17, 2009 to May 15:00, 200, the Defendant installed 60 game machine “sea-to-sea” games on the first floor of the building in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, with no trade name, and operated the game room, operated a speculative act by receiving cash from an unspecified number of customers who found the above game room, and operated the game machine by exchanging in cash the game money acquired by the said customers with the exception of 10% of commission.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. A copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning the F;

1. Protocol of seizure of each police station and on-site photographs;

1. Report on investigation (Confirmation of whether criminal punishment is imposed), and (Attachment to Judgment, etc.);

1. Application of a copy of judgment;

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Crimes under Relevant Articles of the relevant Acts and the Regulation of Speculative Acts, etc. concerning the Selection of Punishment;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes

1. The unemployment of a game room as stated in Paragraph (2) of the crime alleged in the summary of the argument is F, and the defendant receives a daily allowance and is merely an employee who assists in the game room business.

2. The relationship between the Defendant and F, recognized by the evidence of the judgment.