1. The defendant is a person who has driven a B observer car.

On September 20, 2015, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven a B observer car from around 300 meters to the front distance of the “self-ray” in the front of the “satison drive,” which is in the original city level, in the state of alcohol level of 0.12%.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act are those engaged in driving the observer car;

At the time stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant driven the observer car while under the influence of alcohol as stated in paragraph (1), and continued to drive the observer car at a speed not verified by the sk telecom.

There are three-lanes where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, and at the time, the victim C(23 years of age) was proceeding in accordance with the signals in the opposite part of the observer vehicle. The victim E(34 years of age) was in the order of the Fsch Rexroth vehicle in the direction behind the passage of the observer vehicle, and thus, the driver of the vehicle had the duty of care to confirm the safety of the course by well examining the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care are to be exercised.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the front part of the said options car as it was due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence in driving, and continued to turn the front part of the said options car into the front part of the said options car, and continued to turn the said options car into the front part of the said options car.

Ultimately, the defendant is in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and it is necessary to provide the victim C with approximately two weeks medical treatment.