beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.07.19 2017가합9970

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 원고는 고압가스 등 가스 제조, 판매 등을 목적으로 하는 회사로서 가스 제조사업을 하기 위하여 2015. 9. 30.경 피고에게 안성시 미양면 계륵리 산28, 같은 리 산 28-1 지상에 위험물저장 및 처리시설 부지조성(면적 7,613㎡)을 목적으로 한 개발행위허가신청을 하였고, 피고는 2015. 11. 16. 국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률(이하 ‘국토계획법’이라 한다) 제56조 및 제57조 규정을 적용하여 허가조건 이행 및 제세공과금 납부를 조건으로 하여 위 개발행위허가(이하 ‘이 사건 개발행위허가’라 한다)를 하였다.

B. On January 26, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained permission to manufacture high-pressure gas, high-pressure gas and liquefied petroleum gas sales business from the Defendant.

C. On February 1, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained a construction permit for the storage and treatment facilities of dangerous substances from the Defendant, and received a construction report completion certificate on March 17, 2016, and thereafter commenced construction works for the storage and treatment facilities of dangerous substances (hereinafter “instant facilities”) around that time. The Plaintiff commenced construction works for the storage and treatment facilities of dangerous substances (hereinafter “instant facilities”). D.

이후 원고는 2016. 4.경 부지면적 감소 및 건축면적 증가를 이유로, 위치(지번)를 안성시 미양면 계륵리 104-8, 9, 10, 11로, 면적을 7,589㎡로 변경하여 개발행위변경허가신청을 하여 그 무렵 피고로부터 허가를 받았다.

E. Meanwhile, from May 20, 2016, a civil petition that has a problem in the above licensing process was filed, and the Defendant reviewed it and notified the Plaintiff of the instant suspension of construction pursuant to Article 133 of the National Land Planning Act on June 3, 2016, premised on the premise that the instant facility and construction are subject to the determination of an urban/Gun management plan under Article 43 of the National Land Planning Act.

F. In addition, the Defendant around July 4, 2016, pursuant to Article 43 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 35 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the scale of the instant construction project to the Plaintiff.